Marketing · Listing & Trending
One coordinated push across the sites traders actually compare tokens on. CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, DEXTools and the comparison sites your buyers already have open in another tab — listed correctly, trending where it counts, and backed with banner and article placement.
Corum8 gets crypto projects listed, ranked and trending on CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, DEXTools and 30+ comparable rating and comparison sites, plus decentralized-exchange listings on Uniswap and other DEX venues. Work covers listing applications, watchlist and trending placements, top-10 category ranking pushes, and banner ads and articles placed directly on the sites traders actually use to compare tokens before they buy.
What's included
<strong>CoinMarketCap</strong>, <strong>CoinGecko</strong>, <strong>DEXTools</strong> and 30+ comparable comparison sites — applications prepared and verified against each site's specific requirements, not a generic form submission.
Token info, logo, socials and liquidity-pair verification submitted correctly on <strong>Uniswap</strong>, DEXTools pool pages and comparable DEX venues — the details that get a pair rejected when they're wrong.
Getting added to a site's <em>watchlist</em> and <em>trending</em> surfaces — the pages traders actually browse, not the buried listing nobody scrolls to.
Coordinated pushes within a token's category — new listings, top gainers, sector-specific boards — timed against the volume and social signals these sites weight.
Paid banner inventory directly on <strong>CoinMarketCap</strong>-tier, <strong>CoinGecko</strong>-tier and 30+ partner rating sites — placed where comparison-stage traders are already looking, not a generic ad network.
Written placements on rating-site blogs and news sections — the content format each site's own audience already trusts.
Price feeds, socials and project info kept correct across every live listing — a stale listing reads as an abandoned project to a comparison-stage trader.
A specific rollout order across 30+ sites, not a scattershot simultaneous push — each additional listing compounds the credibility of the next.
Is this you?
You don't need all of them. One is usually enough to justify the call.
A buyer who can't find your token on either can't easily verify it exists — for most traders, that's where due diligence starts.
No trending badge, no watchlist adds, buried on page 40 of a category board — a listing that produces zero comparison-stage traffic.
A live Uniswap pool with real depth, but no discovery layer — traders can't find the pair without already knowing to look for it.
A TGE, mainnet launch or major update is coming and top-10 category placement during that window would matter.
People are actively comparing tokens to buy right now on these sites, and yours isn't in the comparison set.
Banner or article placement on the exact rating sites your target trader audience actually visits, not a generic media buy.
Sectors
One listing-and-visibility discipline across every project type.
Day-one listings across CMC, CoinGecko and DEXTools timed to the TGE.
DEX listings paired with watchlist placement once mainnet liquidity is live.
Trending pushes timed to the narrow window meme momentum actually lasts.
Category-board placement coordinated with consumer-facing launch moments.
Complete, accurate listing data for asset-backed products under scrutiny.
Accurate, well-maintained listings that hold up to institutional diligence.
Category-board visibility for a narrative that moves fast and gets crowded.
Listing sequencing that captures the attention window right after launch.
Process
A site-by-site gap check — what's live, what's missing, what's stale — across CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, DEXTools and 30+ comparable sites.
Complete, correct submissions filed per site's own requirements, plus DEX listing verification on Uniswap and comparable venues.
Volume, social and community signals coordinated alongside banner and article placement to push watchlist adds and category rank.
Ongoing accuracy checks and ranking tracking across every live listing, adjusted as the project's audience and category shift.
Case studies
A launch-week trending push for Chain4Energy, and a decentralised-exchange pool with real liquidity nobody could actually find.
Chain4Energy (C4E) is a Layer 1 blockchain built for energy and e-mobility projects — the kind of decentralised physical infrastructure, or DePIN, that needs real hardware in the world behind it, and a community running it rather than a company. Their token generation event was days out with no rating-site presence prepared, a gap that would have left day-one buyers unable to confirm the token even existed. We filed complete CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko applications ahead of the event and coordinated the launch-day rollout around them. Both listings are live and public — linked below, so you can check the work rather than take our word for it.
A DeFi protocol had genuine on-chain liquidity on Uniswap but no discovery layer — traders could only find the pair if they already knew the contract address. Correcting the DEXTools pool listing details, verifying the pair, and pushing the token onto DEXTools' watchlist and new-pairs boards turned invisible liquidity into a pair that showed up in the comparison surfaces its actual target traders were already browsing.
Why Corum8
CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, DEXTools and 30+ others each verify differently — we don't cold-submit the same form everywhere and hope.
Uniswap and DEXTools pool listings run alongside data-provider registrations, under one team instead of split across vendors.
A project buried on page 40 gets the same 'we're listed' claim as one that's trending — we push for visibility, not the checkbox alone.
Banner ads and articles go on the specific rating sites comparison-stage traders use, not a generic programmatic ad network.
Ongoing maintenance so socials, price feeds and project info never go stale across every live listing.
Sequenced alongside PR, community and token-sale marketing so listing visibility lands exactly when the rest of the campaign goes live.
What drives scope
Cost is driven by site count, listing type and ranking ambition.
A CoinMarketCap-plus-CoinGecko baseline is a different scope than a full 30+-site rollout with individual verification per site.
Uniswap and DEXTools pool listings need different verification work than data-provider registrations on CMC-style sites.
A passive listing is lighter scope than an active push for watchlist adds and a top-10 category rank.
Banner and article placements are direct site costs layered on top of the listing work itself — more sites, more placements, more spend.
Listings timed tightly to a TGE or mainnet event need more coordination than an ongoing, evergreen visibility push.
A one-time listing push is a different engagement than ongoing multi-site accuracy and ranking maintenance.
FAQ
It gets a token listed, kept accurate, and pushed toward visibility on the rating and tracker sites traders actually use to compare tokens before buying. That covers applications on CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, DEXTools and 30+ comparable sites, DEX listings on Uniswap and similar venues, watchlist and trending placements, top-10 category ranking pushes, and banner or article placement directly on those sites. A listing that nobody sees isn't doing its job — visibility is the point, not the checkbox.
No — this service is rating-site and DEX listings, not CEX exchange listings. We handle CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko, DEXTools and 30+ comparable comparison and tracker sites, plus decentralized-exchange listings on Uniswap and similar venues. A CEX listing on a venue like Binance or Coinbase is a separate process run through the exchange's own application and market-maker requirements, and isn't part of this offering.
CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko are the two most-referenced sites, and we run listings on 30+ comparable rating and comparison sites beyond those two — including tools like DEXTools for pair-level DEX data. Each site verifies differently: some check contract addresses and liquidity, others check team KYC or social proof. We prepare the submission each site actually requires instead of one generic form sent everywhere.
Yes — we handle the token info, logo, socials and liquidity-pair verification a Uniswap listing and its DEXTools pool page require. Most DEX-listing problems aren't the pool itself, they're the discovery layer around it: a pair with real liquidity that nobody can find because the metadata, verification or pool listing details were never submitted correctly.
Most rating and tracker sites run algorithmic trending and category boards weighted by trading volume, social activity and search interest, refreshed frequently rather than fixed. Getting onto one — or into the top 10 of a specific category board — means coordinating the underlying signals the site's algorithm actually weights, timed to a moment (a launch, a listing, a community push) when those signals are genuinely elevated, not gamed after the fact.
Cost is driven by how many sites you target, whether the work is DEX listings or rating-site registrations, how aggressive the trending and ranking goal is, and whether paid banner or article placement is included. A CoinMarketCap-and-CoinGecko baseline listing is a fraction of the scope of a 30+-site rollout with trending pushes and paid placement layered on top.
They work when they're placed on the specific sites your actual target traders use to compare tokens, not a generic ad network buy. A banner on a rating site's token-comparison page reaches someone actively deciding what to buy — a materially warmer audience than most paid channels. The placement only earns its cost when the site itself gets real comparison-stage traffic from the audience the project needs.
Timing depends on the site and how complete your submission is going in — some rating sites process complete applications within days, others review longer, and trending placement depends on signals building over the specific window a site's algorithm weights. A well-prepared submission moves faster than an incomplete one on every site we've worked with. We build a realistic sequence into the plan rather than promising a fixed date we don't control.
Listings do their best work once there is something for a visitor to find. A complete, accurate profile across the aggregators converts far better when the product is live, the community is staffed and the story is clear. So we usually sequence listings alongside those rather than ahead of them. Accuracy work — supply figures, contract addresses, team details, links — is worth doing early regardless, because wrong data on a major aggregator is surprisingly slow to correct later.
